The UFO Iconoclast(s)

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

What Lonnie Zamora saw in Socorro 1964 (perhaps)

balloon4.jpg

Anthony Bragalia has presented numerous postings here and at his blog suggesting that Lonnie Zamora's 1964 Socorro sighting was a hoax set-up by students (and faculty?) from The New Mexico Institute of Technology.

The students, Mr. Bragalia alleges, were not enamored of Officer Zamora and wanted to get him back for harassing them.

Mr. Bragalia, along with Frank Stalter, has mustered much circumstantial evidence bolstering "The Socorro sighting was a hoax" hypothesis.

Mr. Bragalia has provided a YouTube video (from which I've pulled the images above) that shows what a balloon can do and how one might see such a balloon as a strange vehicle.

Clock HERE to view the YouTube video.

RR

Sunday, May 12, 2013

More Listings from the Library of Congress Bibliography of UFO Material extant in 1969

1942x.jpg

More listings from the 1969 Library of Congress Bibliography of all UFO items extant in that year.

The group of listings includes notes about my friend Leon Davidson's contributions to the UFO literature, and references to George Adamski (and the symbols provided to him by his alleged aliens).

At Kevin Randle's blog a small dust-up between David Rudaik and CDA involves the odd Canadian scientist Wilbert Smith.

Two notes about Smith appear in the Bibliography, and I've appended them to this listing.

Click HERE to access the list.

RR

Thursday, May 09, 2013

Howard Hughes and the 1964 Zamora UFO Sighting

soc.jpg

As many of you know, we have presented the hypothesis that Howard Hughes' Aircraft Company (Hughes Toolco), in providing satellite technology for U.S. Military agencies, under the direction of the C.I.A.'s front organization, Raven Industries, tested a space vehicle in New Mexico, near Socorro, that Police Officer Lonnie Zamora espied and created the noted 1964 Socorro UFO sighting.

(Our many ruminations about this can be found here, at this blog, and others.)

Here's what Wikipedia has to say about Howard Hughes:

In 1948 Hughes created a new division of the company, the Aerospace Group. Two Hughes engineers, Simon Ramo and Dean Wooldridge, had new ideas on the packaging of electronics to make complete fire control systems. Their MA-1 system combined signals from the aircraft's radar with an analog computer to automatically guide the interceptor aircraft into the proper position for firing missiles. At the same time other teams were working with the newly formed US Air Force on air-to-air missiles, delivering the AIM-4 Falcon, then known as the F-98. The MA-1/Falcon package, with several upgrades, was the primary interceptor weapon system in the US for many years, lasting into the 1980s. Ramo and Wooldridge, having failed to reach an agreement with Howard Hughes regarding management problems, resigned in September 1953. They founded the Ramo-Wooldridge Corporation, later to join Thompson Products to form the Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge Corporation based in Canoga Park with Hughes leasing space for nuclear research programs (present day West Hills (Canoga Park).[6] The company became TRW in 1965, another aerospace company and a major competitor to Hughes Aircraft.

A 1962 filed Patent (awarded in 1966) for Hughes and The Aerospace Corporation began the work toward Stealth technology.

Click HERE to see that Patent (and note the submission to the CIA).

The whole of the Stealth development, patents and government documents, is available in a 2006 PDF, which we can provide to interested parties.

RR

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Noted Flying Saucer and/or UFO Landings up to and including 1969

1951c.jpg

Click HERE for a listing, from the Catoe Library of Congress UFO/flying saucer Bibliography for 1969, of book and magazine (et cetera) articles that dealt with alleged landings of flying saucers or UFOs.

RR

Tuesday, May 07, 2013

From The Library of Congress Bibliography of flying saucer/UFO material extant up to and including 1969.

disk.jpg


Lynn E. Catoe once provided a complete Bibliography for The Library of Congress of UFO/flying saucer materials up to and through 1969.

I've culled listings from that Bibliography which have some connection to items we've discussed at this blog or which are so quirky that they need to be reviewed.

I'll place the mountain of material I think you might like or that which may lead you to obscure and/or well-known UFO reports and stories that you'd like to pursue, or heard about but don't remember the source.

This first installment (one of many to come) are listings of alleged abductions, but not the usual Alien Abductions that have taken hold in UFO lore.

These are early stories or accounts by people who think or say they were taken aboard a flying saucer and flown someplace bizarre or had a weird experience -- but, again, not the medical probe accounts or frightening reports  that are reported nowadays.

Click HERE to access the page of Bibliographic notations.

N.B. I have nothing more about the listings than what you'll find in them. You'll have to Google information from the listings to get details.

RR

Sunday, May 05, 2013

Damn you Kenneth Arnold!

Citing old flying saucer or UFO sightings irks some UFO mavens, but we have to consider one sighting, which is iconic and the causa principia of all that follows in UFO lore: Kenneth Arnold’s June 24, 1947 sighting near Mt. Rainier.

karnold.jpg

Was Ken Arnold deluded by flying pelicans or a strange, unique meteorological phenomenon? Did he see experimental aircraft? Was he hallucinating? Was his eyesight/mind affected by a lack of oxygen or airflight vertigo?

Whatever Ken Arnold saw or thought he saw, he was affected (or afflicted) by that June 1947 sighting in ways that confirm Mr. Arnold believed wholeheartedly that he saw something extraordinary and otherworldly.

sidney.jpg

An article by Sidney Shalett in the April 30, 1949 edition of The Saturday Evening POST provides confirmation that Ken Arnold became a “flying saucer” believer and dedicated the rest of his life to finding out what it was that he had seen or experienced.

arnold1.jpg 

arnold1a.jpg 

arnold2.jpg

Shalett’s interpretation of Arnold’s sighting:

Arnold-a.jpg

Ken Arnold did not appear to have a psychosis or any other demeaning mental affliction. My feeling is that if a person truly has an unusual experience, it will be personally transforming, which was the case with Ken Arnold.

Persons hoaxing UFO sightings or who have been deluded by a hallucinatory event will come to discard their tale or mental disturbance; even “insane” persons will abandon their delusion if treated therapeutically.

But Arnold never wavered in his belief. That he came to the idea his sighting was of otherworldly craft can be debated. It’s an option that tests credulity but remains a possible option.

Whatever Arnold aw or experienced, his sighting, as Shalett observes in the rest of his POST article, that observation – real or mentally created – has brought the flying saucer/UFO phenomenon (or dilemma) down upon us, even to this day.

Without Arnold, UFOs or flying saucers would have remained odd occurrences dismissed by almost everybody, even those of us consumed by the damn things.

RR

Friday, May 03, 2013

The Skeptical Arguments for the 1947 Roswell Crashed Saucer Scenario

This paper by Kent Jeffrey appeared in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 79± 101, 1998:


roswellcda.jpg

The content below is Mr. Jeffrey's concluding remarks. It sums up the major arguments of those skeptical of the Roswell Crashed Saucer story.

(I've placed in italics one of Christopher Allan's [CDA] primary objection to the Roswell story.)

The paper, in its entirety is erudite and splendidly sensible. Those interested, who have not seen it, would do well to read it. If necessary, we can put a link to it online here.

Conclusion:

Any complete and reasonable response by those who still contend that a UFO crashed at Roswell in 1947 will need to directly address the points below, each of which would have to be a true statement if such a crash occurred:

· A machine with unimaginable technological sophistication and consequent incredible reliability would have simply broken down and crashed.

· The only known wreckage from this sophisticated vehicle, capable of interstellar travel, would have consisted solely of a few short beams, pieces of foil-like material, and small pieces of thin plastic-like material.

· By incredible coincidence, the material from the crashed spaceship would have very closely resembled the material left by the radar reflectorsfrom a balloon array that went down in the same general area a few weeks earlier.

· Despite the fact that this would have been the most spectacular event in recorded history, and despite the fact that  word was already out that something had happened (because of Lt. Haut’s press release), there was absolutely no  contemporary discussion or talk about such an earthshaking event among the pilots and navigators of the close-knit 509th Bomb Group.

· West Point graduate and retired general Thomas Dubose, would have to have lied nine times in an interview when he stated that the debris (definitely that from an ML-307 radar reflector) shown in the pictures in Ramey’s off ice was not substituted material and was the ª real debrisº recovered from the ranch northwest of Roswell.

· Major General C. P. Cabell, Director of Intelligence for the Air Force at the Pentagon, who prepared a report on the unidentified flying object situation for the Secretary of Defense, astoundingly, would have been preparing the report totally ignorant of the fact that the Air Force was in possession of a crashed flying saucer.

· Three retired Air Force colonels, all former top officials at the Foreign Technology Division at Wright Patterson Air Force base would have been lying to me unnecessarily wasting inordinate amounts of their own personal time in a protracted game of charades.

We have now gotten to the heart of the story and established that the debris recovered from the Foster ranch and laid out on the Marcel kitchen floor was, except for some unusual symbols, of a very mundane nature. The following should then be asked of those still arguing the issue: How do you get a crashed alien spaceship out of such ordinary debris? What basis is there now for postulating the existence of a crashed UFO.?
------------------------

RR

Wednesday, May 01, 2013

A Morphing UFO (1963)

The 1963 Colorado UFO

In a comment for the Darwinian Ufology posting, I mentioned a clip that we inserted at this blog (and others), early on, that represented, for us, a view of the ultimate evolutionary UFO, which also examples Tony Bragalia’s morphing metal, as found in the Roswell crashed saucer(s) and examined, he has discovered, by Battelle (and other research entities that work for the United States government and/or military).

Here are three clips (from YouTube) of the UFO filmed in 1963 in Colorado – note the changing shape of the UFO:









RR

Call for Extraterrestrial Probe

rep.jpg

Former U. S, Representative pushes for government action in search for the existence (proof?) of extraterrestrials.

She also wants to uncover the alleged cover-up of the Roswell incident.

Detroit NEWS story

RR

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

The Alien Abduction Files: A Review

Warwick Associates, a PR firm, often sends us books, for review, from New Page Books, a division of Career Press in Pompton Plains, NJ.

New Page Books publishes many books each year that many of you would find or have found to be interesting, books about the paranormal and spiritual topics.

Recently we received The Alien Abduction Files by Kathleen Marden (Betty Hill’s niece) and Denise Stoner (A MUFON Field Investigator).

abduct.jpg

Normally, we eschew the alien abduction topic, having decided, to our satisfaction, that the phenomenon is psychological/neurological oriented.

But I thought we should give the book a serious perusal, as Ms. Marden and Ms. Stoner are serious, credentialed women who have written a serious book, filled with accounts and data , 253 pages full.

Of course, both women have come to the conclusion that abductions are real and the phenomenon is viable.

Abductees or, better, “experiencers,” have, individually, and separately, provided testimony that seems to intersect with one another so that there are common threads and information that is unique but confirmational.

When one reads in Chapter 16, Page 226, for instance, that ET’s have told experiencers that astral entities, called collectors or controllers, are attracted to humanity’s behavior, we have left prosaic reason for a world which is weirder than weird.

The writers do allow that alien abductions may be a psychological aberration but that it is widespread, reaching across the world encompassing all races, cultures, religions, and socioeconomic groups. [Page 201]

More importantly, both women say they, too, have experienced missing time and were aboard an identical huge craft, in the same time-frame but separately.

You make of that what you will, but there is a psychological explanation, and some of you know what it is.

The book is rife with recounted experiences, and tales that have a patina of truth and pain in them.

Experiencers believe they have been abducted by alien beings. But their reality is far removed from life as the rest of us know it.

You have to get the book to make your own evaluation. I am too cynical or skeptical to provide an unbiased review.

The book sells for $16.99 and can be found at online and offline booksellers.

And you can find more about it at:


RR

Monday, April 29, 2013

The Flatwoods Monster: A Creation of the U.S. Air Force?

flatwoods2.jpg

Nick Redfern, in his book, Monster Files, which I reviewed earlier here (see posting below this one), takes up the Flatwoods Monster sighting of 1952 in Chapter 6 [Page 63 ff.].

Nick notes that, during World War II, a bizarre episode by the British, as recounted in a Rand Corporation 1950 document (The Exploitation of Superstitions for Purposes of Psychological Warfare), was provided by a Jean M. Hungerford that involved the British military building a 12 foot scarecrow-like robot to frighten the Italians fighting in Italy’s mountains.

The “scarecrow” – an imaginative creation of one Jasper Maskelyne -- supposedly emitted “frightful flashes and bangs” to scare the superstitious Italian soldiers who were allied with the Nazis, thus creating chaos and havoc on the lines.

(Yes, it’s a silly tale, and, on its face, one that stretches credulity.)

The United State Air Force, however seems to have taken the idea and elaborated upon it, as part of that agencies psy-operations, and built their own 12 foot creature and tested it out in Flatwoods, West Virginia in 1952.

Here are two links about that episode, for those who need a refresher course:



You can read about both convoluted affairs in Nick’s book. And see how Nick comes to the conclusion that the U.S. Air Force was responsible for the Flatwoods sighting, which had nothing to do with an alien visitation and a monster extraterrestrial but was only an elaborate psy-op of the U.S. military, one of many in the time-frame.

What’s your thinking on the matter?

RR 

Nick Redfern's latest: Monster Files

Our friend Nick Redfern’s new book is this one:
mfiles.jpg

Monster Files: A Look Inside Government Secrets and Classified Documents on Bizarre Creatures and Extraordinary Animals

Two hundred eighty-five pages of material culled from the inner sanctums of various government entities.

A spurt of Chapter headings shows pure Redfernian curiosity:

The President’s Bigfoot
A Wartime Wolfman
Weird and Wacky Winged Wonders of War
An Army of Manimals
A Yeti-Hunting 007
The Strange Saga of Acoustic Kitty
The Nessie Files
Sasquatch, UFOs , and the U.S. Air Force

Oh, and there is more, but you should get the book, especially if you’re a cryptozoological aficionado. I am not.

But I always find something valuable or interesting when I am lucky enough to get a Redfern book.

Nick doesn’t just hypothesize; he researches and investigates, thoroughly.

I can’t do justice to Nick’s work. His writings transcend the ordinary. And he excels at detail; detail that is relevant and pertinent.

He doesn’t just write to bulk up copy. He provides the goods.

For example, in Chapter 23, The Biggest Blooper of Them All, he reveals that The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, along with the U.S. Navy, monitored a strange “Bloop” during a routine 1997 sound tracking in he Pacific Ocean, off of South America.

The “bloop” lasted 60 seconds and its sonic frequencies seemed to indicate that a large living creature was roaming the waters.

In his recounting, Nick cites H. P. Lovecraft’s  Cthulhu mythos, Melville’s Moby Dick, and Jules Verne’s Captain Nemo.

(No literary slouch, that Redfern.)

In Chapter 15 [Sasquatch, UFOs, and the U.S. Air Force, Page 141 ff.] Nick offers what I consider to be various nightmare and psychotic accounts involving a “Steve Palmer,” Big Foot, and paranormal researcher Stan Gordon.

Palmer, in the Fall of 1973, at his Pennsylvania farm, spotted a huge luminous object and two large beasts with long arms and glowing green eyes that he shot at – to no effect – before the beasts scurried into the darkness, as the UFO disappeared.

 Researcher Gordon, alerted by a state trooper, met with Palmer, several hours later.

Gordon, Palmer, and some cohorts went to the site of the alleged encounter, where Palmer had, what I would call a fugue state: Palmer started breathing heavily and assumed an animalistic growl before throwing his own father and one of the accompanying fellows to the ground.

The other men started to feel sick, from a smell of rotten eggs or sulfur.

Palmer said that while he was in his altered state he encountered a black-robed figure, carrying a sickle, who warned that if humankind did not change its way, the world would come to an end.

A few weeks later, Palmer had two visitors – a man in a regular suit and one dressed as an Air Force officer.

They asked about that weird encounter, and showed him photos of Sasquatch-like entities, relating that such creatures were real as were UFOs.

Palmer agreed to be hypnotized, to provide more data, ostensibly, and when the session was over, the men left. Palmer never heard from them after that.

Nick’s pages have many such weird accounts.

Such stories will turn off the more rational among you – I find the account to be flush with psychological elements, or even neurological taint – but Nick’s readers will find such tales to be part of the paranormal world they think is as real as our prosaic world.

Yes, the material in Nick’s new book is far out – it’s the fringe at the edge if fringe.

But if you are inclined to find such stories interesting or possible, you’ll love Nick’s book.

The Paperback sells for $15.99 and can be found at online and offline booksellers.

You can also find out more about it at:


RR 

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Luke Ford [UFO DNA] Analyses the Chiles-Whitted sighting and Heflin's Photos

chiles.jpg

We received this missive from our friend Luke Ford of the UFO DNA site:

Hi, I've started doing some original research again after a delay of a couple years and the first results are:

Chiles Redux - a reexamination of the classic Blue Book unknown Chiles case, going back to original source documents, showing conclusively it was an earth-grazing meteor, not a B-29-sized cigar-shaped spacecraft: 


Heflin Again - absolutely positively proving again the photos were faked, of a very small object close to the camera - but why the interest of aerospace companies in the sighting? 


I would be glad if you could link to them or repost if you find them of value.

Luke Ford

Luke's scrutiny of the 1948 Chiles-Whitted sighting and Heflin's saucer photos noted here are worth your examination.

RR`

Saturday, April 27, 2013

UFOs in formation?

We've had this negative for many years now, sent to us when we had an active UFO "research" construct in Florida: UFOLAB.

negative.jpg

We approached several people on the UFO UpDate list years ago but their evaluations were wanting.

I'd be interested in any evaluation from photography buffs who might tell us what they can about the images or the negative.

RR

From an interesting paper -- by Ron Westrum

In "Social Intelligence About Anomalies: The Case of UFOs" Ron Westrum provides some interesting insights.

He points out, for instance, how an observer might be led to the idea that he or she has seen a UFO when in fact they saw something less exotic.

He also writes about science's reluctance to get entangled in the UFO milieu.

But one item he notes, comes from Ed Ruppelt's 1956 Ace paperback, in which Ruppelt allows that Blue Book destroyed UFO reports -- on a regular basis.

Click HERE to see those excerpts noted, and seek out the paper for yourselves; it's an example of judicious writing about a topic that is bandied about by people who barely know how to write or think.

RR

Friday, April 26, 2013

Roswell's Balloons (and they're not Mogul)

skyhook.jpg

A paper from December 1947 outlines what happened to meteorological balloons in the Roswell event time-frame.

David Rudiak and other Roswell-oriented researchers have provided reams of defensive material about how the Roswell incident couldn't involve Mogul balloons.

But in this paper here, Mogul balloons were not what made up the Brazel debris. The balloon pieces found were meteorological balloon bits and pieces.

http://fkbureau.homestead.com/J-Balloons.pdf

N.B. The references to Clarke and Korff in this 1947 abstract are not Brit researcher David Clarke nor infamous UFO gadfly Kal Korff.

RR

Bigfoot -- a hokey Indiana report

bf-21.jpg

The ABC affiliate in Fort Wayne, Indiana, where a few RRRGroup fellows work, aired this piece, Thursday, April 25th, 2013.

Yes, it's about Bigfoot. not UFOs, but it shows what one has to deal with when media gets their hands on something out-of-the-ordinary.

(The reference, at the end is about the local weather guy, who grows a beard each summer as part of a promotion.)

http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/news/local/Bigfoot-Truth-or-Myth-204704361.html

RR

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The UFO Propulsion System?

raven.jpg

Scouring through our archived material, I came across a paper, entitled 21st Century Propulsion Concept.

Seventy-three pages with references to anti-gravity and electrostatic systems that have been tested over the years, at the behest of the United States Air Force, complicit with the United State Navy (of course).

I've selected portions of the PDF to highlight the abstruse content.

Note the references: experimental devices, Anti-Gravity discs, The Flying Saucer [movie], Flying Apparatus, and UFO Encounter I:

http://FKBureau.homestead.com

The paper more than hints that the U.S. militaries have been studying and testing propulsion systems with some connections to flying saucers.

Why that connection?

I've included captures from the paper which interested parties might wish to pursue.

The Navy always shows up in these accounts of esoteric experiments and tests, even though the experiments and tests are for things that fly. not things that sail.

I'm interested in your comments.

RR

Sunday, April 21, 2013

New UFO Magazine


COMING SOON

UFO TODAY – THE NEW DIGITAL MAGAZINE FROM DEADGOOD PUBLISHING LTD. 

UFO TODAY will be edited by veteran British ufologist Philip Mantle. With regular columnists and contributors from around the world UFO TODAY aims to cover any and all aspects of the UFO enigma. Just when the skeptics had told you that UFOs were dead UFO TODAY will show them just how wrong they were. UFO TODAY will also cover the latest UFO news, views and reviews.

UFO TODAY is the newest UFO Magazine that takes a modern, informative, entertaining and interesting look at all aspects of the UFO enigma

From alien investigations to brand new UFO cases mixed with in-depth features on classic UFO sighting and interviews with UFO experts and witnesses.

Discussion and debate from all side of the UFO argument, even the skeptics get their say.

The new fresh modern UFO Magazine that takes a look at the past, the present and the future aspects of the UFO enigma - UFO TODAY - The magazine that is literally "out of this world"

Featured Columnists: Some names you will know some you may not.

Kevin Randle, John Hanson, Chris Aubeck, Patricia Cori, Kevin Goodman, Rebecca Lomas, Nick Pope, Robbie Graham & Thiago Ticchetti.

If you have any interest in ufology then UFO TODAY could well be just exactly what you are looking for. More information will be available soon but in the meantime if you would like to know more, or perhaps you are interested in contributing, then please contact Philip Mantle via email at: philip.mantle@gmail.com

21.jpg

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Ray Beaming UFOs [Redux]

The following colloquy comes about because Netwing was unable to comment (for some reason) at the blog, and the beaming UFOs posting of the other day.

I thought the video was important and what Netwing had to say about the person who provided it via YouTube.

RR
----------------------------------------------------
Have you viewed what may be the most notorious, contemporary beam-spewing UFO video on YouTube?  The popular interpretation is that the underlying terrain is being analyzed, or perhaps mapped.


What's the point?

If there's purpose behind any of these manifestations, it may be simply to capture the observer's attention.  Of late, there appears to be a bit of posturing by some of these objects.  "Dress up" as allurement for jaded witnesses.

I enjoy your blog very much.  Less so, Mr. Duensing's convoluted comments.

Hi ho

Netwing
--------------------------------------------------
Netwing....

Fascinating and the asides during the video are hilarious.

It's a great UFO beaming video.

Can you add the link and what you said in your e-mail as a comment at the blog, for others to enjoy?

Rich
---------------------------------------------------------
[Rich] 

Thanks for taking time to view the video, and for your response.

Alison’s a funny and very driven citizen researcher who’s spent thousands she could ill afford to part with on equipment used to document the activity of plasma-orb-to-fake-plane UFOs in her local hotspot.  She’d uploaded nearly 200 videos to her other, main YouTube channel before it was hacked into and all the videos removed.  Orb UFOs are seen arriving, resting in foliage at ground level, transforming into airborne craft, landing, and departing.  A few of her best videos have been lost, others not re-uploaded.

The point, for her, has been to entice someone, anyone with scientific expertise, to come to Murrysville to make a serious study of the UFO activity taking place there.  No luck so far.

Sadly, because her expensive equipment has been falling into disrepair, she seldom posts videos at this time.  Instead, she encourages other witnesses to file MUFON reports, and shares videos of their sightings.

I don’t have a Google account to allow me to comment on your posts.  Feel free to share the link to Alison’s beamer with your readers if you like.

Every warm wish,

Netwing